Home / Studies / “Active” is a word, not a fact

“Active” is a word, not a fact

Every license record carries two separate facts: a status word and an expiration date. Usually they agree. Sometimes the word says current and the date has already passed — and then the word alone cannot carry the weight people put on it.

1,883
Vermont current-list records past their own expiration date
508
Connecticut published records in the same position
62
Washington ACTIVE records past their expiration date

Nothing here suggests any individual record is improper. Boards record the word and the date on their own cycles, renewals land when they land, and a record can be entirely in order while its two facts briefly disagree. The finding is about what a status word is: a label a board recorded, next to a date the same board recorded. When they disagree, the date is the one with a number in it. That is why every record page on this site prints the status and the expiration date side by side, with the date of the records they came from.

Vermont: one record in six

The Vermont Division of Fire Safety publishes the list of its current plumbing and electrical licensees: 11,524 records. Counted against the records’ own date, 1,883 of them — 16.3% — carry expiration dates that have already passed: 895 expired during 2024 and 2025, and 988 more during 2026. A homeowner reading that list meets a wall of current licensees; roughly one in six is current by the list’s say-so and past due by its own date. Vermont records are not yet published on this site; the count is of the board’s published list itself, and it is the extreme case that makes the general point impossible to miss.

Connecticut: the mechanism, visible

Connecticut’s Department of Consumer Protection records three current statuses, and the published records here carry 508 whose expiration dates have passed, out of 46,021. The split is the story:

Status as recordedRecordsExpiration date passed
ACTIVE45,55552
ACTIVE IN RENEWAL447447
ACTIVE UNDER REVIEW199

Every one of the 447 ACTIVE IN RENEWAL records is past its date — which is what the words themselves say, once you read them literally: the credential is in renewal because its term ended. The date printed is the old term’s end. The genuine word-versus-date disagreements are the 52 plain ACTIVE records (and 9 of the 19 under review): no mechanism in the words explains those; the two facts simply disagree, and a reader who checks only the word will never know.

Ohio, Washington, Florida, Minnesota, Oregon

Ohio’s Construction Industry Licensing Board publishes a roster of current licenses. Among the records published here, 32 of 10,462 ACTIVE records carry passed expiration dates, with 14 more among the 1,800 ACTIVE IN RENEWAL records. Counted on the board’s full roster instead, the figure is 61 of 12,389 rows — the difference is records this site holds back under its publishing rules, stated here so the two bases are never confused.

Washington’s Department of Labor & Industries records 76,097 credentials as ACTIVE in the published set; 62 of them carry expiration dates before the records’ date. Florida’s DBPR records 96,553 licenses as Current — Active; 5 are past their expiration dates (8 across the wider Current family of 108,307). Minnesota’s DLI records 11,580 published licenses as Issued; 2 are past date. Oregon’s Construction Contractors Board publishes no status word — its list is the claim — and 11 of its 45,750 listed records carry passed expiration dates.

Where the word and the date agree

In seven states’ published records, the disagreement does not occur at all — every record whose status presents it as current carries an expiration date that has not passed:

StateCurrent presentationRecordsPast expiration date
CaliforniaCLEAR232,4130
ArizonaActive58,3290
IllinoisACTIVE4,8280
District of ColumbiaActive5,8320
Virginia(no status word — current lists)53,4780
TexasCurrent (Responsible Master Plumbers)8,5510
DelawareActive80

And one state cannot be tested by word at all: Texas’s TDLR publishes no status for its contractor licenses, and 3,258 of 36,019 contractor records in its published data — 9% — carry expiration dates that have passed, with no word beside them to agree or disagree. There, the date is the only currency test there is, which is the test this site applies before publishing a Texas record.

Reading a record

The practical habit is short: read the date, not just the word. A status word tells you what the board recorded; the expiration date tells you until when. On every record here — California, Washington, Florida — the two print together, beside the date of the records they came from, so the comparison this study makes statewide is one you can make on any single license in seconds.

Methodology

Sources: the published records of the Vermont Division of Fire Safety, the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection, the Ohio Construction Industry Licensing Board, the Washington Department of Labor & Industries, the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation, the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry, the Oregon Construction Contractors Board, the California Contractors State License Board, the Arizona Registrar of Contractors, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, the District Department of Consumer and Regulatory Affairs, the Virginia Department of Professional and Occupational Regulation, the Texas State Board of Plumbing Examiners and the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation, and the Delaware Division of Professional Regulation — Arizona’s dated November 2, 2026, the rest November 3, 2026.

“Past its expiration date” means the expiration date recorded for the license is earlier than the date of the records it appears in. “Presents as current” uses each board’s own presentation: the status words listed in the tables (for Florida, the Current — Active pair; the wider Current family is counted separately where stated), presence on a board’s published list of current licensees where the board records no status word, and — for Ohio — both the basis of the records published here and the board’s full roster, each labeled. Some states’ record pages are not yet live on this site; counts on the “published here” basis describe the records this site holds for publication for that state under its publishing rules. No individual record is characterized beyond the two facts the board itself recorded for it.

More studies